Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Monday, November 28, 2011
Thursday, November 24, 2011
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Monday, November 21, 2011
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Friday, November 18, 2011
Thursday, November 17, 2011
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Sunday, November 13, 2011
Lone Star Watchdog: What Should Have Been Voted to Amend to the Texas ...
Lone Star Watchdog: What Should Have Been Voted to Amend to the Texas ...: It was a useless election last Tuesday in Texas. They had ten propositions to amend to the Texas Constitution to be up for a v...
What Is An Agent Provocateur? Let Me Show You
Gregman from youtube CLEARLY documents a staged provocateur and staged photo op in Salt Lake.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Economic Fearrorism
www.truthradionet.com/trn-originals
Jays SiteTRUTHRADIONET
Jays SiteTRUTHRADIONET
(11-10-11)
by LJC ThreeThousand (Jay)
To the average corporate-controlled news media followers the coming economic collapse may seem like a surprise. To those of us who actually follow what's going on in the world, this is not a new revelation. In fact many of us (yours truly included) have been warning of this impending crisis for a very long time. Not because we're smarter than the so-called experts and economists paraded out daily in the mainstream media, but because we actually take the time to do the research required to form intelligent thoughts and opinions free from the influence of talking heads who get paid to under report the news or flat out deceive the masses.
Propaganda is frequently deployed in the media to help form the opinions and shape the thoughts of a dumbed-down populace in order to garner support for whatever the agenda is... or is to be. The "news" about the worldwide economic collapse is no different. In fact there is a form of propaganda being deployed now that has a proven track record of success... Fear. Just a brief look into our recent past and we see examples of how well fear works to further an agenda.
-Back in the 1980's the fear of crack cocaine and other illicit drugs taking over middle America was used to launch "the war on drugs." With it came new government departments, offices, agencies, policies and policing powers. The "war on drugs" allowed for U.S. Military assets to be used in other countries to help stop (or increase? profit from?) the flow of narcotics into this country. The march toward a New World Order now had the desired crisis to deploy U.S troops and resources to other nations in order to fight a faceless enemy. After all, who could forget the coverage on the nightly news of drug induced crime sprees and pictures of crack-addicted babies? Only a cold-hearted, un-feeling individual could be against the "war on drugs" now.
-Also in the 1980's the fear of a sub-standard education system producing illiterate students who would not be able to compete in the emerging global marketplace provided the perfect opportunity for our government to become more involved in our children's education. Schools across the country would teach from a standardized core curriculum brought about by the influence of those in the Department of Education and others in D.C. The march toward a New World Order now had the perfect reason to be involved in the way students were educated (indoctrinated). Who in their right mind could possibly be opposed to more government influence in the classroom? After all, it was proclaimed in the media that the system is damaged and in need of repair.
-In the 1990's the fear of outsourcing and lost American jobs allowed for the passage of NAFTA and normalized trade relations with China. Ross Perot was mocked in the media when he correctly predicted that "the giant sucking sound" you'll hear would be jobs leaving the U.S. and heading south of the border due to the cheaper labor costs. The march toward a New World Order now had the "free trade" agreement needed to slowly erode our nation's economic security and sovereignty. Who could possibly be opposed to such international trade deals when the fear of lost jobs and lowered wages was reported nightly in the media? The feeling was that you were "un-American" if you didn't agree with such trade "deals." (Need I remind anyone that the vast overwhelming majority of us were wildly opposed to NAFTA and China's elevated status? Did our concerns or wishes matter to the politicians? Nope)
-Then in the early months of this new century, after the events of September 11, 2001, the fear of a faceless enemy attacking us on our soil was the impetus for the "War On Terror." The media was all too willing to play it's part to ramp up the fear. The precedent that was set in the 1980's "war on drugs" to utilize U.S. military assets globally to fight an unseen enemy would once again be the sought-after solution. The march toward a New World Order now had it's standing military force. You were considered a terrorist sympathizer, a terrorist or worse yet, anti-American if you even hinted that you were against such military operations.
-In the late 2000's fear would once again rear it's ugly head when politicians were warned that if TARP and various stimulus plans and bailouts were not passed into law, that there would be an economic crisis that would cause widespread panic and a resulting economic meltdown. The march toward a New World Order now had a firm foothold in U.S. economic policy. We were told by the media that the bailouts and the stimulus plans were needed to stave-off the looming crisis. Fear played the greatest role in getting these "initiatives" passed even though there was a majority of us opposed.
This bring us to where we are now, November 2011 and the world's economy teeters on the brink of disaster. It has been a slow moving train chugging along the tracks toward a collapse and no one seems willing to apply the brakes or attempt to derail it. Why? As I have have stated numerous times on my radio shows, the next phase of the New World Order needs such an event to take place in order to finally tear down the existing institutions of national governance and sovereignty so that a new system of global integration can be implemented. The media, governments, so called experts, and economists are now forced to admit that the severe economic "downturn" has not gotten any better. In fact is has worsened.
Greece is on the brink of collapse. Italy and Spain are not too far behind. Portugal has received "bailout" funds from the IMF. Ireland is on the brink of economic failure. France is undertaking further austerity measures or "belt tightening" to satisfy their creditors. Demonstrations and protests against other forms of austerity measures have already taken place in the UK and other locales.
I will not be so stupid as to suggest that a financial collapse couldn't happen here in the U.S. It is a very real possibility and it suits the needs of the globalists. Instead allow me to offer a different scenario... Greece, Italy, Spain, Ireland and Portugal's (and maybe some others') debt load could very well be too heavy a burden for the Euro Zone to carry. It is already being discussed that maybe some or all of these countries' exit from the economic bloc might just be in the best interests of the union in order to save it. Make no mistake about it, there will be a Euro Zone economic meltdown. The implications of which are hard to predict, as is the global contagion. I think it is absolutely possible regardless of how severe the European collapse, that the fear of it happening here could very well be enough to scare the populace and reluctant politicians into accepting the total New World Order takeover.
It has been opined many times that this country could be conquered without a single shot being fired. We just might be on the brink of that happening. If the corporate-controlled mainstream media plays it's part as well as it has in the past of ramping up the fear to promote an agenda, it's not too difficult to see such a scenario. Fear is a powerful motivating tactic, and those who wish to implement a one world order are far too familiar with it and adept at deploying it. They wouldn't hesitate to do so again if it is believed that it could produce the desired effect.
Turn off the mainstream media, seek alternatives. Regain the ability to form thoughts without the globalization-pimping controlled media telling you how to. Take some time to get educated on what is really going on in the world. When you do, it will be much easier to see the agenda playing out right before your eyes.
Yes friends, fear is a very powerful motivational tool, but so is knowledge. Get Involved. Get Informed. Get Prepared. Then spread the word.
A New World Order is upon us. The only questions that remain: Are we going to allow fear to dictate our willingness to accept it? Or can we slow it down enough to try and stop it?
You can listen to my radio show weeknights on TruthRadioNet at 10:00 pm ET/7:00 pm PT and every Thursday on Resistance Radio at 4:30 pm ET/1:30 pm PT.
~Jay
Imminent Iran nuclear threat? A timeline of warnings since 1979. - Earliest warnings: 1979-84
Imminent Iran nuclear threat? A timeline of warnings since 1979. - Earliest warnings: 1979-84 - CSMonitor.com
Breathless predictions that the Islamic Republic will soon be at the brink of nuclear capability, or – worse – acquire an actual nuclear bomb, are not new.
For more than quarter of a century Western officials have claimed repeatedly that Iran is close to joining the nuclear club. Such a result is always declared "unacceptable" and a possible reason for military action, with "all options on the table" to prevent upsetting the Mideast strategic balance dominated by the US and Israel.
And yet, those predictions have time and again come and gone. This chronicle of past predictions lends historical perspective to today’s rhetoric about Iran.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
In NC, only 41 sterilization victims found after eugenics program
In NC, only 41 sterilization victims found so far - Yahoo! News
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina officials have tracked down less than four dozen of the thousands of residents forced to undergo sterilizations between 1929 and 1974.
The Charlotte Observer reported Sunday (http://bit.ly/o75cyT ) that state officials believe at least 1,500 of the 7,600 people sterilized under a state program are still alive. But only 41 files have been matched to living survivors or relatives of the dead.
North Carolina officials are considering compensating survivors. A task force Perdue created in March is supposed to figure out possible cash payments. It is expected to make its recommendation in February.
The Eugenics Board approved sterilizations for people who suffered from mental illness, epilepsy and those with low intelligence.
___
UN Report Offers Smoking Gun Proof of NATO and US Lies about Libya
UN Report Offers Smoking Gun Proof of NATO and US Lies about Libya
November 7, 2011
Here is a type of "smoking gun" proof that NATO and the U.S. has been operating through a smokescreen of lies, as well as intimidation. Please read the following January 4, 2011 report of the 16th Session of the United Nations General Assembly Human Rights Council, Universal Periodic Review:
Report of the Working Group on the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya [Document A/HRC/WG.6/9/L.13]
Before NATO and the U.S. started bombing Libya, the United Nations was preparing to bestow an award on Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, and the Libyan Jamahiriya, for its achievements in the area of human rights. That's right--the same man, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, that NATO and the United States have been telling us for months is a "brutal dictator," was set to be given an award for his human rights record in Libya. How strange it is that the United Nations was set to bestow a human rights award on a "brutal dictator," at the end of March.
So, I ask a question. Who is this "brutal dictator" that the United Nations General Assembly Human Rights Council was preparing to bestow an award to, for human rights, sometime at the end of March? So, they would have us believe that they knew that he was a "brutal dictator," yet decided to give him an award for human rights?! Astounding! Astounding the lies that we're being told by the media, NATO and the U.S. government. Absolutely astounding! Not surprising, but astounding! But more astounding still, is the fact that, time after time after time, much of the American public--without questioning--believes every single word that comes from the "news" media.
It is noteworthy to read the following couple of sentences from the General Assembly's report:
Here is a type of "smoking gun" proof that NATO and the U.S. has been operating through a smokescreen of lies, as well as intimidation. Please read the following January 4, 2011 report of the 16th Session of the United Nations General Assembly Human Rights Council, Universal Periodic Review:
Report of the Working Group on the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya [Document A/HRC/WG.6/9/L.13]
Before NATO and the U.S. started bombing Libya, the United Nations was preparing to bestow an award on Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, and the Libyan Jamahiriya, for its achievements in the area of human rights. That's right--the same man, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, that NATO and the United States have been telling us for months is a "brutal dictator," was set to be given an award for his human rights record in Libya. How strange it is that the United Nations was set to bestow a human rights award on a "brutal dictator," at the end of March.
So, I ask a question. Who is this "brutal dictator" that the United Nations General Assembly Human Rights Council was preparing to bestow an award to, for human rights, sometime at the end of March? So, they would have us believe that they knew that he was a "brutal dictator," yet decided to give him an award for human rights?! Astounding! Astounding the lies that we're being told by the media, NATO and the U.S. government. Absolutely astounding! Not surprising, but astounding! But more astounding still, is the fact that, time after time after time, much of the American public--without questioning--believes every single word that comes from the "news" media.
It is noteworthy to read the following couple of sentences from the General Assembly's report:
"Several delegations also noted with appreciation the country's commitment to upholding human rights on the ground. Additional statements, which could not be delivered during the interactive dialogue, owing to time constraints, will be posted on the extranet of the universal periodic review when available."In a footnote of that report, there is a list of countries that praised Colonel Gaddafi and the Libyan Jamahiriya (state of the masses), in support of the General Assembly Human Rights Council's decision to bestow this award upon Colonel Gaddafi. I simply present the list. The reader can look at the list and make his or her own judgement regarding the credibility level, or perceived credibility level, of any of the particular countries listed:
Denmark, China, Italy, The Netherlands, Mauritania, Slovenia, Nicaragua, The Russian Federation, Spain, Indonesia, Sweden,Norway, Ecuador, Hungary, South Africa, The Phillippines, Maldives, Chile, Singapore, Germany, Australia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Angola, Nigeria, Congo, Burundi, Zambia, Rwanda, Burkina Faso, Senegal, Cote d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Zimbabwe.
Monday, November 7, 2011
Sunday, November 6, 2011
The "Going Green" Con
The Green Thing
Checking out at the store, the young cashier suggested to the older woman, that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't good for the environment.
The woman apologized and explained, "We didn't have this green thing back in my earlier days."
The clerk responded, "That's our problem today. Your generation did not care enough to save our environment for future generations."
She was right -- our generation didn't have the green thing in its day.
Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were recycled. But we didn't have the green thing back in our day.
We walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks. But she was right. We didn't have the green thing in our day.
Back then, we washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throw-away kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy gobbling machine burning up 220 volts -- wind and solar power really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing. But that young lady is right; we didn't have the green thing back in our day.
Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house -- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana . In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, we didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity. But she's right; we didn't have the green thing back then.
We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull. But we didn't have the green thing back then.
Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service. We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn't need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 2,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest pizza joint.
But isn't it sad the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn't have the green thing back then? How on earth did we all survive?
Please forward this on to another selfish old person who needs a lesson in conservation from a smartass young person.
Remember: Don't make old people mad.
We don't like being old in the first place, so it doesn't take much to piss us off.
Checking out at the store, the young cashier suggested to the older woman, that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't good for the environment.
The woman apologized and explained, "We didn't have this green thing back in my earlier days."
The clerk responded, "That's our problem today. Your generation did not care enough to save our environment for future generations."
She was right -- our generation didn't have the green thing in its day.
Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were recycled. But we didn't have the green thing back in our day.
We walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks. But she was right. We didn't have the green thing in our day.
Back then, we washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throw-away kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy gobbling machine burning up 220 volts -- wind and solar power really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing. But that young lady is right; we didn't have the green thing back in our day.
Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house -- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana . In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, we didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity. But she's right; we didn't have the green thing back then.
We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull. But we didn't have the green thing back then.
Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service. We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn't need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 2,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest pizza joint.
But isn't it sad the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn't have the green thing back then? How on earth did we all survive?
Please forward this on to another selfish old person who needs a lesson in conservation from a smartass young person.
Remember: Don't make old people mad.
We don't like being old in the first place, so it doesn't take much to piss us off.
Friday, November 4, 2011
Thursday, November 3, 2011
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
2 Days After Sherrif Chuck Wrights Comments Property owner fends off intruders with shotgun in Pauline
Deputies: Property owner fends off intruders with shotgun in Pauline | GoUpstate.com
Published: Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 4:44 p.m.
Last Modified: Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 4:44 p.m.
The Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office is in the early stages of investigating a shooting involving a property owner and two intruders in Pauline.
A property owner was inside a storage building on Miller Town road when two people walked in, according to a statement from the sheriff's office. The property owner challenged the two suspects, who apparently did not have permission to be there. The property owner pointed a shotgun at the suspects. As one of the suspects reached into his waist belt, the property owner shot the man in the upper left arm, according to the sheriff's office.
As the pair started to flee, one yelled, “Get him,” and the other turned back at the property owner, who fired a second shot, which missed. Both suspects are in the custody of the sheriff's office. Details are expected to be released shortly on them.
The shooting takes place two days after Spartanburg County Sheriff Chuck Wright encouraged female residents to get concealed weapons permits in order to protect themselves. The comments came at a news conference about an attempted rape in Milliken Park.
Wright said the man accused in that assault was fortunate that a person with a concealed weapons permit wasn't around during the attack, saying someone could have put the “animal” down. Wright's comments have since made headlines around the world, and set off a flurry of interest in concealed weapons classes.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Ugly Truth for the Fed: Inflation Pressures Here to Stay - Yahoo! Finance
Ugly Truth for the Fed: Inflation Pressures Here to Stay - Yahoo! Finance
On Tuesday November 1, 2011, 3:31 pm EDT
For the Federal Reserve, policymaking these days is about deciding which of two imposing evils to take on - a decidedly moribund economy or the increasing threat that inflation poses to battered consumers.
For much of the slow slog out of the financial crisis, the Fed which is meeting this week and will issue its policy statement Wednesday, has managed to train its gaze on jump-starting growth through its various quantitative easing measures.
But recent indicators show that inflation is posing an equally daunting threat that further monetary accommodation from the Fed might serve only to aggravate.
The pressure has come primarily through measures that Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke likes to call "transitory" - namely, the volatile but steady rise of food and energy prices that don't make up core inflation measures but usually impact consumers more.
Economists increasingly believe that while the so-called core Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure has remained around the 2 percent level that pleases the Fed, headline inflation that includes things such as groceries and gasoline is becoming a growing menace. The more inclusive inflation measure is at 3.9 percent and hammering at consumers, including the 14 million who remain unemployed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)